THỦ HIẾN DANIEL ANDREW THUỘC LABOR VICTORIA LÀ ĐỨA LÉN LÚT LÀM TAY SAI CHO TRUNG CỘNG VÌ BỊ GÁI TRUNG CỘNG DU DỖ- ANDREW ĐÃ ĐƯỢC RƯỚC QUA TRUNG CỘNG CHO ĂN CHƠI FREE ĐỂ KÝ "VÀNH ĐAI CON ĐƯỜNG" CỦA TRUNG CỘNG - PHEN NẦY SẼ THÂN BẠI DANH LIỆT VỀ ĐUỔI RUỒI CHO VỢ./-TCL
===============
Labor’s branch-stacking scandal is a problem for the whole party, not just Victoria
The ALP now has so few active members they can be easily swamped by those ‘stacked’ into the party
Victorian Labor, the jewel in the party’s crown, has been thrown into crisis by the allegations of massive branch stacking.
A third state Labor minister has now left their position over the scandal that as engulfed the party in the wake of revelations by the Age and 60 Minutes.
But with the federal leader, Anthony Albanese, also facing questions about party culture, the scandal will not be contained to Victoria.
Declining membership facilitates branch stacking
On Monday the Victorian premier, Daniel Andrews, sacked the Labor powerbroker Adem Somyurek from his cabinet. This came after allegations Somyurek was involved in “industrial-scale” branch stacking and used offensive language about a ministerial colleague.
As the federal Labor MP and former academic Andrew Leigh has shown, the propensity of Australians to join formal organisations has been in steady decline for 50 years and parties are a key example. Weeds have sprouted in these ruins.
The infrastructure of party and union branches that once underpinned politics in Labor heartlands has collapsed. The factories are gone and Labor branches have in most cases shrunken to a few ageing true believers.
Branch stacking is possible because Labor’s active membership is now so low they can be easily swamped by those “stacked” into the party.
Preselections for safe seats in state parliament are often determined by fewer than 50 votes at the local level.
We have been here before
Branch stacking is, however, not new.
During the cold war, membership soared as left and right battled for control. But back then, it reflected real ideological disagreements that mobilised thousands. This popularisation sparked acatastrophic split in the ALP.
Today, Labor is not divided by deep ideological battles and as a consequence, its membership is much lower. As a further result, it is much easier to stack the branches.
With Labor as the dominant political force in Victoria, it is now mostly jobs – from lowly electorate officers to ministerial roles – that people fight about. The power of factional bosses rests on their ability to control access to these positions.
The need for change
The decline in the levels of Labor membership and the commitment of Labor voters have concerned supporters for decades.
Today, new political forces such as the Greens and independents are now going after Labor in their heartland. Even at the 2018 landslide victory of the Andrews government, the Greens retained three seats and independents mounted serious challenges in safe Labor seats.
One popular proposal has been to increase the rights of members, so they can have a greater say in how the party is run. At the federal level and for some states, this has taken the form of direct ballots for parliamentary leaders.
This method was described by the former ALP national secretary George Wright as “an outrageous success” in 2013, leading to an extra 4,500 members at the time. But some states – including Victoria – have not gone down this path.
Some have argued it would be better to give up the dream of building a mass membership Labor party and instead allow all Labor voters, not just party members, to select candidates by a US-style system of primaries.
But the likely outcome would be an even more media-centric politics, where political celebrities – such as the Canadian leader, Justin Trudeau – would communicate directly with voters. It is a weak shield against a populist right on the march.
Organisational reforms flagged
On Tuesday night the ALP president, Wayne Swan, announced that the former Victorian premier Steve Bracks and the former federal frontbencher Jenny Macklin have been appointed administrators of the Victorian branchuntil the end of January 2021.
They will report on how the branch “should be restructured and reconstituted so that the branch membership comprises genuine, consenting, self-funding party members”.
So, organisational reforms are most likely in the short term. These could include banning the payment of membership fees in cash as well as a proposed audit of party membership.
But in the absence of a larger and engaged membership, organisational reforms will always be subject to evasion. The highly centralised pre-selection system in Victorian Labor provides an incentive to stack but reform of this would disrupt the delicate factional balance within the ALP.
The political fallout
The branch-stacking scandal also presents political opportunities for Labor’s opponents.
For the Greens, this latest scandal offers the opportunity to challenge Victorian Labor’s progressive image. In the short run the Andrews brand is strong enough to ride out the loss of less-talented ministers but one day the political tide will turn. The collapse of the once all-conquering New South Wales Labor party is a cautionary lesson.
At a federal level, it drags Albanese back into mire of Labor politics and undercuts his attempt to present him as an inner-suburban everyman – unlike the former leader Bill Shorten, who could never escape his identity as a political hack.
If Labor loses the forthcoming Eden-Monaro byelection, all Labor MPs – not just the Victorians – will have more to worry about.
Albanese most of all.
- Geoffrey Robinson is a political historian and lecturer in history and politics at Deakin University
- This article first appeared on the Conversation. You can read the original article here
With those in power failing us …
… at this historic moment, we demand better. From the coronavirus pandemic and police brutality to the marginalisation of minority communities around the world, leadership is broken. Devoid of the humility and inclusivity we so desperately need, and given to narcissism, leaders are gambling with public health, safety and the future of younger generations. They unapologetically prioritise serving themselves over the people they were elected to serve. We have to make them raise their game.
That’s what the Guardian’s here for. As an open, independent news organisation we investigate, interrogate and expose the incompetence and indifference of those in power, without fear. Our journalism is free from political and commercial bias – this makes us different. We can give a voice to the oppressed and neglected, and stand in solidarity with those who are calling for a fairer future. With your help we can bring about improvement.
You’ve read in the last six months. And you’re not alone; millions are flocking to the Guardian for quality news every day. We believe everyone deserves access to information that is fact-checked, and analysis that has authority and integrity. That’s why, unlike many others, we made a choice: to keep Guardian reporting open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay.
We’re determined to provide journalism that helps each of us better understand the world, and take actions that challenge, unite, and inspire change – in times of crisis and beyond. Our work would not be possible without our readers, who now support our work from 180 countries around the world.
But news organisations are facing an existential threat. With advertising revenues plummeting, the Guardian risks losing a major source of its funding. More than ever before, we’re reliant on financial support from readers to fill the gap. Your support keeps us independent, open, and means we can maintain our high quality reporting – investigating, disentangling and interrogating.
Every reader contribution, however big or small, is so valuable for our future. Support the Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment