Mt68 History

Trang Mậu Thân 68 do QUÂN CÁN CHÁNH VNCH và TÙ NHÂN CẢI TẠO HẢI NGỌAI THIẾT LẬP TỪ 18 THÁNG 6 NĂM 2006.- Đã đăng 11,179 bài và bản tin - Bị Hacker phá hoại vào Ngày 04-6-2012. Tái thiết với Lập Trường chống Cộng cố hữu và tích cực tiếp tay Cộng Đồng Tỵ Nạn nhằm tê liệt hóa VC Nằm Vùng Hải Ngoại.
Showing posts with label USIsraelIranWar2026. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USIsraelIranWar2026. Show all posts

Wednesday, 2 September 2026

 VỎ QUÍT IRAN DẦY -MÓNG TAY TRUMP NHỌN:

MỸ ÂM THẦM NẠO, VÉT SÂU 93 FEET DỌC BỜ BIỂN OMAN ĐỂ MỞ MỘT TUYẾN ĐƯỜNG AN TOÀN MỚI CHO TÀU CHỞ DẦU, HÀNG HÓA... TRÁNH XA PHÍA IRAN KHI RA VÀO VỊNH HORMUZ - KHIẾN IRAN NGẨN NGƠ- KHÔNG CÒN TUYỆT ĐỐI KIỂM SOÁT TÀU HÀNG NHƯ TRƯỚC- VẤN ĐỀ BẾ TẮC VỊNH HORMUZ ĐÃ CHUYỂN HƯỚNG CÓ LỢI THẾ CHO MỸ./-Mt68


US Opens Route Around Hormuz Strait


Satellite imagery reveals American naval forces have dredged a deep-water channel along Oman's coast, enabling oil tankers to avoid Iran's reach in the strategic waterway

Bianca Jones

AUG 30, 2026 17:36

A new analysis of satellite imagery has revealed that American naval forces have quietly executed a major engineering project in the Strait of Hormuz, creating an alternative shipping lane that circumvents Iranian control over the vital waterway. According to high-resolution satellite photographs collected over recent months, the US Navy has dredged and deepened the seabed along a route between the Omani coastline and a nearby island, establishing a new passage outside the traditional international shipping corridor. The satellite monitoring shows that in recent months, American forces undertook an underwater excavation operation, scraping and deepening the ocean floor to widen a shipping route that previously could not accommodate large oil tankers. This new channel runs close to Oman's coast, beyond the operational reach of the Iranian regime.

The original natural shipping lane measured approximately 1,600 feet wide with a natural depth of around 93 feet, dimensions sufficient for standard commercial vessels but inadequate for the massive oil tankers known in the petroleum industry as VLCCs (Very Large Crude Carriers).

Over recent months, the US Navy re-engineered the route, dredging the seabed and conducting widening operations along the passage located between the Omani island of Jazirat Musandam and the Omani mainland.

The channel has now become one of the strait's major new traffic arteries, with the United States moving millions of barrels of oil through it nightly. Thanks to Jazirat island flanking the route from the north and the curvature of the Earth, Iranian forces cannot effectively target attacks on the new passage.Iran

on Wednesday announced that it and agreed on the coordinates of new commercial shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz after several rounds of negotiations, but stressed that the incoming deal would not end the crisis in the region.

Esmaeil Baghaei, spokesperson for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, told reporters that the reopening of the strait is contingent on the U.S. removing its naval blockade and halting all attacks on Iranian infrastructure.“An understanding with Oman cannot, in itself, mean that the strait has become safe for passing vessels, because the factors creating insecurity in the Strait of Hormuz — particularly the U.S. naval blockade and other actions against Iran and its interests — remain in place,” he said.____________________
Definition
dredge
[drɛdʒ]
dredge (verb)
dredges (third person present)
dredged (past tense)
dredged (past participle)
dredging (present participle)
  1. clear the bed of (a harbour, river, or other area of water) by scooping out mud, weeds, and rubbish with a dredge:
    "the lower stretch of the river had been dredged"
    "the dredging and deepening of the canal"
    • bring up or clear (something) from a river, harbour, or other area of water with a dredge:
      "mud was dredged out of the harbour"
      "they start to dredge for oysters in November"

Friday, 7 August 2026

NHƯ THẾ NẦY MỸ ĐÃ VÀ SẼ THUA IRAN MÀ THÔI- TRUMP HẾT HY VỌNG VỀ MỘT THỎA THUẬN NÀO ĐÓ VỚI IRAN- RUBIO VÀ VANCE CŨNG VÔ DỤNG LUÔN./-Mt68
________________

Tướng hàng đầu của Mỹ kêu gọi Nhà Trắng rút lui khỏi cuộc chiến với Iran.


Trong vài tuần qua, Chủ tịch Hội đồng Tham mưu trưởng Liên quân Mỹ, Tướng Dan Caine, đã nói rõ với các cố vấn cấp cao khác của Trump rằng Mỹ cần tìm cách rút lui khỏi cuộc chiến với Iran - CNN dẫn các nguồn tin riêng cho biết.

Theo các nguồn tin của CNN, các lựa chọn quân sự hiện có để leo thang xung đột có thể phản tác dụng và chỉ riêng sức mạnh không quân khó có thể đạt được các mục tiêu đã nêu của Tổng thống Donald Trump, theo ba nguồn tin thân cận với vấn đề này.

“Caine đang tìm lối thoát” - một nguồn tin thẳng thừng cho biết.

Ông Caine không phải là người duy nhất cho rằng cuộc chiến đã đến bước ngoặt. Hai nguồn tin cho biết, ông đã thảo luận về những lo ngại liên quan đến các lựa chọn quân sự để leo thang xung đột và nêu lên khả năng tìm ra lối thoát khỏi cuộc chiến với các quan chức chủ chốt khác trong nội các, bao gồm Giám đốc CIA John Ratcliffe, Ngoại trưởng Marco Rubio và Phó Tổng thống JD Vance.

Vị tướng cấp cao nhất của Mỹ gần đây đã có những cuộc trao đổi riêng với một số cố vấn quan trọng, cùng chí hướng với ông Trump, nhằm thúc đẩy sự phối hợp giữa các cơ quan và đảm bảo họ có cùng quan điểm trước các cuộc họp với tổng thống. Mục đích là để làm rõ những hạn chế và rủi ro của các phương án quân sự hiện có, bao gồm cả những phương án không liên quan đến việc đưa quân đội Mỹ xuống mặt đất, các nguồn tin cho biết.

Ông Trump liên tục tỏ ra không thích ý tưởng triển khai quân bộ ở Iran, thay vào đó ông cho rằng việc ném bom từ trên không có thể buộc họ phải đồng ý một thỏa thuận theo điều kiện của ông. Theo nhiều nguồn tin thân cận với các cuộc thảo luận gần đây, ông Caine và những người khác trong nội các của ông Trump cho rằng kết quả đó khó có thể xảy ra và thay vào đó đã tìm cách phát triển các phương án khác phù hợp với các tiêu chí của tổng thống.

Người phát ngôn của ông Caine, Bộ Ngoại giao Mỹ và CIA không bình luận về những thông tin này.

'Sức mạnh không quân có những giới hạn nhất định'

Cuộc chiến đã leo thang đến mức nhiều quan chức an ninh quốc gia hàng đầu của chính quyền Trump, với học thuyết quân sự, đánh giá từ cộng đồng tình báo Mỹ và lẽ thường, tin vào điều mà chính Caine đã nói với các nhà lập pháp trong một phiên điều trần công khai vào cuối tháng trước - “sức mạnh không quân có những giới hạn của nó”.

Vì những lý do đó, ông Caine và các quan chức khác của chính quyền Trump đã tỏ ra thận trọng với kế hoạch mới nhất vào cuối tháng Bảy nhằm phát động các cuộc tấn công mới, quyết liệt hơn do lo ngại về những hậu quả có thể xảy ra nếu xung đột leo thang, ngay cả khi tổng thống dường như đã sẵn sàng bật đèn xanh cho cái mà ông mô tả là một chiến dịch “quy mô lớn”, một trong những nguồn tin cho biết, nhưng từ chối tiết lộ chi tiết về hoạt động.

“Chỉ có một số thành phần thuộc CENTCOM ủng hộ chiến dịch này” - nguồn tin cho biết thêm, đồng thời lưu ý rằng Israel cũng ủng hộ rộng rãi một chiến dịch nhằm leo thang xung đột.

Cuối cùng, ông Trump đã quyết định rút lui sau khi nói chuyện với các đồng minh ở Trung Đông, những người nói với ông rằng họ lo sợ sự trả đũa của Iran, cụ thể là các cuộc tấn công trả đũa vào cơ sở hạ tầng năng lượng của họ, một quan chức cấp cao của chính quyền nói với CNN, thêm rằng tổng thống không loại bỏ kế hoạch tấn công vào thời điểm đó trong tương lai.

Tuy nhiên, theo CNN đưa tin, việc kho dự trữ đạn dược quan trọng của Mỹ đang cạn kiệt cũng là một yếu tố, nhiều nguồn tin cho biết đây là mối lo ngại không chỉ do ông Caine mà còn do các quan chức vùng Vịnh nêu ra.

Hơn nữa, theo CNN, quân đội Mỹ tin chắc rằng các cuộc không kích vào cơ sở hạ tầng sẽ không buộc Iran đầu hàng, mà sẽ gây ra các cuộc tấn công trả đũa nhằm vào các đồng minh của nước này ở vùng Vịnh Ba Tư. Một chiến thắng quyết định chỉ có thể đạt được thông qua một chiến dịch trên bộ quy mô lớn, điều mà chính Trump và những người thân cận của ông kiên quyết bác bỏ do nguy cơ tổn thất lớn.

Hôm thứ Sáu, Bộ trưởng Tài chính Mỹ Scott Bessent cho biết Washington có thể đạt được thỏa thuận ngừng bắn từ 30 đến 60 ngày với Iran ngay trong ngày 7 hoặc 8/8.



Hôm Chủ nhật tuần trước, ông Trump tuyên bố đã ngừng các cuộc tấn công vào Iran trong bối cảnh thỏa thuận hòa bình sắp đạt được, trong đó bao gồm việc mở cửa eo biển Hormuz và các thỏa thuận về chương trình hạt nhân. Bộ Ngoại giao Iran hôm thứ Tư báo cáo rằng Iran và Muscat đã nhất trí về các chi tiết địa lý của tuyến đường cho tàu thuyền đi qua eo biển Hormuz.

Wednesday, 5 August 2026

TT TRUMP ĐÃ VÀ ĐANG ẢO TƯỞNG VỀ MỘT THỎA THUẬN VỚI IRAN- TOMORROW NEVER COME TO TRUMP - HE'S ONLY "L'ILLUSION"./-Mt68

___________

Closing summary














  • New talks between Washington and Tehran are the “last chance” for Iran to forge a deal and avoid an escalation of US strikes on the country, Donald Trump said on Monday. It comes a day after the US president again said he had called off further “massive strikes” because Gulf allies had urged diplomacy. It’s all very consistent with Trump’s repeated pattern over the last five months as he struggles to find an off-ramp; he threatens devastating military action, only to pull back at the last minute and claim the two sides are on the brink of an agreement to end the war. As my colleague Patrick Wintour notes, this is thought to be the 12th time in the war that Trump has called off threatened strikes.

  • Indeed, Trump said he expected negotiations to begin in the next day or two to reopen the strait and create a pathway for Iran to address the US’s concerns about its nuclear programme. “The first phase is the opening of the straits. The second phase will be the denuclearization,” he told reporters in the Oval Office. “And that will take a little while.” He also reiterated that he was running out of patience with Iran, saying “this the last chance for them to sign a good document.”

  • However, Tehran had on Monday denied that talks with the US were taking place. Esmaeil Baghaei, Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson, told reporters at a weekly press briefing on Monday that Iran is not currently holding any talks with the US – contradicting claims made by Trump on Sunday night that talks with Iran would happen the next day.

  • Baghaei said that there were no plans to receive a delegation or send an Iranian one, and that Iran’s current focus was on negotiations with Oman over the strait of Hormuz. “We are now going to reach an understanding on a route acceptable to both sides – neither the northern route nor the southern route – but one that respects the sovereign rights of both sides and safeguards our national interests and security,” he said in an interview with Iranian state television.

  • To that, the US president called the Iranian leadership “unbelievably duplicitous” in a post on social media. He wrote on Truth Social: “They ask for a meeting, some would say ‘beg’, talks begin, with more scheduled in the immediate future, and they say, openly and proudly, that they’re not having any discussions, that nothing is being talked about, and they’re only dealing with ‘Oman’.”Analysis: Trump meets his obstinate match in Iran’s hardball regime

Andrew Roth

Andrew Roth

The Donald Trump doctrine has always contained a tenuous relationship with the truth. It was his mentor, the infamous New York lawyer Roy Cohn, who taught the young real estate mogul always to claim victory and never to admit defeat. Unfortunately for Trump, in Iran the US president has found a counterpart just as stubborn as himself.

As Trump claims new negotiations are to begin with Tehran this week, Iran has shown it can also reignite the conflict by lobbing ballistic missiles at US bases in the region and maintaining a stranglehold on the strait of Hormuz, effectively taking initiative in the stalled peace process. And time is of the essence for Trump as the clock ticks toward a global energy crisis and a painful midterm elections for him and his Republican party.

But as soon as his latest attempt to hammer out a peace deal was announced, it was denied by Iran and the US president was left fuming once again.

Trump has suggested dozens of times since the beginning of the war that a deal with Iran is imminent, and his latest claim that new negotiations could produce a peace deal within days has shown the administration’s desperation to reopen the strait and find a road map out of the crisis. After promising to hit Iran “very hard”, Trump made a U-turn on Sunday and claimed that talks would continue and that the “perimeters of a deal” for the opening of Hormuz and the “denuclearization of Iran” had been agreed.

Unfortunately, the Iranians don’t agree. In a statement on Monday, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson denied any peace negotiations were taking place. “We are not currently negotiating with the United States,” said Esmaeil Baqaei. “Our negotiations are with Oman to secure passage through the strait of Hormuz.”

That may result in an agreement. But that will not result in the return of the strait of Hormuz to its prewar status, Baqaei added, in effect keeping the waterway a political football for the foreseeable future. “We must ensure that the strait of Hormuz cannot be misused by parties that have committed aggression against Iran,” said Baqaei.

Little has changed since the last round of negotiations. Iran remains capable of closing the strait of Hormuz and stifling shipping – including a fifth of global oil supply – through the crucial waterway. The US remains capable of inflicting devastating strikes on Iran – despite a shortage of key munitions that could be needed for a war against key rivals like China – but has a lack of meaningful targets that could force Iran to change its policy.

The Trump administration has been signalling a desire to end the conflict since April and three ceasefires have come and collapsed since then. With just over three months left until the US midterm elections, in which the Republicans are expected to lose the House and possibly even the Senate, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll last week showed that fewer than a third of Americans support the war in Iran, and 69% believe that Trump has not “clearly explained the goals of US military involvement in Iran”.

For Iran, the strategic unpredictability has become a new weapon in a war that has counterintuitively strengthened its negotiating position, giving the regime new tools in slowing global oil supply and in attacking regional US allies in the Gulf.

Iran has concluded that its best strategy is to “maximise the pain that they can impose on the United States and its partners in the region”, said Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute and an expert on Middle East security issues with a focus on Iran, during the institute’s podcast last week. The view there was that Trump “is not really yet ready for a deal with Iran, not a deal that would work for the Iranians anyway”.

Iran is also facing a time crunch with a US blockade in effect halting trade out of the country.

“They are now at a point where they don’t think just sitting back and having one round after another of diplomatic talks is the best way forward,” he added. “They’re trying to shake things up to try get Trump’s attention and see if they can get a different result./-

Tuesday, 4 August 2026

CÓ LẼ NGOÀI NƯỚC MỸ:
KHÔNG AI HIỂU NỔI TẠI SAO ĐANG LÚC CHIẾN TRANH MÀ TỰ MỸ LẠI TIẾT LỘ "CHIẾN TRANH VỚI IRAN NƯỚC MỸ ĐÃ XÀI HẾT 80% HỎA TIỄN CHỐNG HỎA TIỄN"???- NHƯ VẬY IRAN CHỈ CẦN NÍN THỞ BẮN THÊM Ồ ẠT VÀI NGÀY LÀ MỸ HẾT LUÔN 20% CÒN LẠI??? NHƯNG NẾU IRAN CHỊU KÝ THỎA THUẬN VÀO NGÀY MAI LẠI LÀ MỘT CHUYỆN LẠ KHÁC NỮA???./-Mt68
________________
US military has used up nearly 80% of key missile interceptors as commanders warn stockpiles ‘dangerously low,’ sources say

Zachary Cohen,
Updated 1 hr 31 min ago

In the August 27, 2025 photo, an Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) is displayed in Unterluess, Germany.
Annegret Hilse/Reuters



The US military has exhausted nearly 80% of its interceptors for a key missile defense system as senior US military commanders are warning that the Pentagon’s munitions stockpile is “dangerously low,” according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

Stockpiles of key air defense systems have been particularly depleted during the war with Iran. The US military has burned through nearly four-fifths of its THAAD missile inventory compared to pre-war numbers and roughly half of its Patriot interceptors since the start of the war, according to two sources familiar with the latest inventory report. The disclosure of the low THAAD inventory has not been previously reported.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimates the United States had around 2,200 Patriots (of the platform’s two most-modernized variants) and 452 THAAD missiles in its stockpile before the Iran war started.

Gulf allies have also raised fresh concerns about how a shortage of air defense systems could impact their ability to ward off potential Iranian retaliation if President Donald Trump decides to escalate the ongoing conflict.

Several of those countries rely on US air defense systems and have acknowledged the stockpile shortage could hinder their own ability to intercept incoming Iranian missile and drone attacks – particularly if they are targeted in response to any American escalation, multiple officials said.

The stockpile issue was raised again prior to the president’s decision last weekend to cancel new strikes on Iran, marking at least the second time in recent weeks that Trump’s senior military advisers have specifically voiced concerns about the dwindling number of key US munitions during discussions about potentially escalating the conflict with Iran.

The US Army has also used “virtually all” of its highly accurate long-range, surface-to-air weapons during the conflict, according to the source familiar with recent internal Pentagon reports. Reuters first reported the specific concerns about US stockpiles of long-range precision missiles.

Weekend strikes called off

The recent warnings about munitions shortages — coupled with other intelligence presented to Trump about the potential negative effects of striking Iran’s critical infrastructure, including energy-related targets, and concerns voiced by Gulf countries — have been compelling enough to convince some of Trump’s most hawkish advisers there were was reason to call off planned operations over the weekend, the sources said.

Trump on Friday was planning to move forward with massive strikes, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth received the final “go ahead” order on Friday, according to a senior Trump official.

But Trump decided to back off after talking with Middle East allies on Saturday, who told him they were afraid of Iranian retaliation, specifically retaliatory attacks on their energy infrastructure, according to the official. Trump agreed to hear them, and Iran, out. He subsequently told Hegseth to stand down, for now, but is not taking the planned strikes off the table for a future date.

“America’s military is the most powerful in the world and has everything it needs to execute at the time and place of the President’s choosing,” Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement to CNN.

“We have executed multiple successful operations across combatant commands while ensuring the U.S. military possesses a deep arsenal of capabilities to protect our people and our interests,” he added.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told CNN that the US military “has more than enough munitions, ammo, and stockpiles to serve all of President Trump’s strategic goals and beyond.”

“Operation Epic Fury has exposed what happens when you mess with the United States. Even still, the President has urged our defense contractors to constantly produce more made-in-America weapons, which are the best in the world,” Kelly added.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine similarly raised the stockpile issue during another White House meeting late last month where military options for escalating the conflict were discussed, CNN previously reported. The potential for massive civilian casualties inside Iran if the US resumed major combat operations was also raised, another person familiar with the matter said.

But the persistent concerns about stockpile estimates provided to CNN underline the seriousness of the shortages and call into question the US’ ability to carry out strikes against Iran for an extended period.

The stockpile shortage could also impact the American military’s ability to fight a potential future war with China, Russia or even North Korea, experts have told CNN.

‘Tit-for-tat will never end this.’

“The lack of interceptors means that conventional attacks can backfire if the suicide drones start making it through in-masse,” one of the sources familiar with the stockpile concerns said. “Tit-for-tat will never end this.”

The long-range missiles that have been primarily used up during the war with Iran are known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), the sources noted.

The US’ stockpile of Tomahawk missiles also remains significantly depleted, as close to half of those weapons have been used during the war, one of the sources said.

CNN reported in April that the US military had used nearly 30% of its Tomahawks during the early stages of the war.

On Monday, Trump called Iranian leadership “unbelievably duplicitous” on social media after Tehran contradicted his claim that negotiations would resume.

He later insisted that this is Iran’s “last chance” to sign a deal, but he also said he has no time constraints on negotiations because he’s not seeking reelection.

The early phase of the Iran conflict, dubbed Operation Epic Fury, saw the US military expend thousands of key missiles used for long-range precision strikes and to defend against enemy air and missile attacks, according to analysts and previous CNN reporting.

US Air Force aerial porters prepare to load Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) support equipment onto a C-17 Globemaster III in October 2024.

Replenishment rates are low for key missiles, analysts tell CNN — according to current fiscal year delivery schedules, the Pentagon is receiving roughly 15 new Tomahawks and 20 new Patriot missiles per month. The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated it would take three or more years to rebuild THAAD inventories to pre-Iran war levels.

The Defense Department has accelerated its efforts to expand interceptor missile production in recent months, including two deals inked this week to boost Patriot and THAAD rocket motor manufacturing, but a spokesperson declined to answer questions about when the expansion will lead to results.

Analysts say it could take years to fully replenish the US stockpile of high-end munitions, like Patriot missiles, due to the lead time for producing those weapons.

Other missile inventories, such as those for the Precision Strike Missile and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, will be quicker to rebound and should reach their pre-war level by mid-to-late 2027, according to analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

CNN’s Davis Winkie contributed reporting.

CORRECTION: This article has been corrected to reflect that Reuters first reported on concerns about US stockpiles of long-range precision rather than strategic missiles./-